All-Decade Team: First base
First base, in theory, should be one of the easiest positions for a Frontier League team to fill with a quality player. After all, it's one of the toughest positions for a young player to advance through the minor league system. There are so many quality first basemen in the majors (except in Pittsburgh) that many good prospects never make it to the big leagues or they eventually get switched to other positions.
There also are many college first basemen who are excellent hitters but don't have the defensive skills necessary to become a prospect. These guys often get shuffled to the independent leagues.
The Wild Things, as expected, have had some quality first basemen in their first 10 seasons but by no means has it been a position of strength each year (see 2011).
Finding a starting first baseman for the All-Decade team wasn't easy. Two players (Andy Hudak and Nathan Messner) played two seasons here and had similar results. Each put up big numbers in their first years, only to have the batting average dip by at least 55 points in the second go-around.
One of the things I had forgotten about Washington first basemen before I began researching the numbers was just how good of a base stealer Zach Cates (2003) was for a big guy. Cates, a power hitter, swiped 20 bases. He had a big first half of the season but tailed off considerably in the second half, batting only .170 in August.
From a numbers standpoint, the best season (at least part of one) for a Washington first baseman was by Ernie Banks in 2009 when he hit .343 with 19 home runs, both highs for the position. However, Banks was suspended by the team during the season and eventually traded after he played in only 54 games. Banks returned in 2011, but his bat had slowed considerably. He hit only .207 and was traded.
So who is the all-decade first baseman? I'll have to go with a guy who spent only one season in Washington, but it was a very consistent and highly productive campaign by the the best defensive first baseman to play for the Wild Things: Bill Greenwell (pictured).
Greenwell played for Washington in 2004 and put up good numbers, batting .293 with 15 doubles, 13 home runs and 72 RBI. The latter number is the record for Washington first basemen and was third-best total in the league in 2004.
Greenwell led the Frontier League in RBI in 2003 while playing for Mid-Missouri, then was acquired during spring training by Washington in steal of a trade for pitchers Jason Elkins and Brian Dorsey. Greenwell's most memorable game with the Wild Things, oddly enough, had to be the first time he wasn't in the starting lineup. That August night he sang the national anthem prior to the game, then came off the bench to hit a walkoff home run to beat Chillicothe.
All-Decade First Baseman: Bill Greenwell (2004)
There also are many college first basemen who are excellent hitters but don't have the defensive skills necessary to become a prospect. These guys often get shuffled to the independent leagues.
The Wild Things, as expected, have had some quality first basemen in their first 10 seasons but by no means has it been a position of strength each year (see 2011).
Finding a starting first baseman for the All-Decade team wasn't easy. Two players (Andy Hudak and Nathan Messner) played two seasons here and had similar results. Each put up big numbers in their first years, only to have the batting average dip by at least 55 points in the second go-around.
One of the things I had forgotten about Washington first basemen before I began researching the numbers was just how good of a base stealer Zach Cates (2003) was for a big guy. Cates, a power hitter, swiped 20 bases. He had a big first half of the season but tailed off considerably in the second half, batting only .170 in August.
From a numbers standpoint, the best season (at least part of one) for a Washington first baseman was by Ernie Banks in 2009 when he hit .343 with 19 home runs, both highs for the position. However, Banks was suspended by the team during the season and eventually traded after he played in only 54 games. Banks returned in 2011, but his bat had slowed considerably. He hit only .207 and was traded.
So who is the all-decade first baseman? I'll have to go with a guy who spent only one season in Washington, but it was a very consistent and highly productive campaign by the the best defensive first baseman to play for the Wild Things: Bill Greenwell (pictured).
Greenwell played for Washington in 2004 and put up good numbers, batting .293 with 15 doubles, 13 home runs and 72 RBI. The latter number is the record for Washington first basemen and was third-best total in the league in 2004.
Greenwell led the Frontier League in RBI in 2003 while playing for Mid-Missouri, then was acquired during spring training by Washington in steal of a trade for pitchers Jason Elkins and Brian Dorsey. Greenwell's most memorable game with the Wild Things, oddly enough, had to be the first time he wasn't in the starting lineup. That August night he sang the national anthem prior to the game, then came off the bench to hit a walkoff home run to beat Chillicothe.
All-Decade First Baseman: Bill Greenwell (2004)
Labels: Bill Greenwell
13 Comments:
Has anybody else noted that when even the slightest mention of the Wild Things financial woes
is made, the moderator changes the thread to something else that usually has no, or very little, importance at all? So, is he aware of these problems and trying to avoid the fact that the Wild Things are in deep
trouble? This has happened with each of the last three threads! Other times a thread can get as stale as old bread without being changed. I'm just asking..
Acting as an ostrich and placing our heads in the sand will change nothing. During the so-called ‘advisory
group’ meetings this fact is perfectly obvious. One the most bazaar things I’ve ever heard of for a baseball team to do is, in fact, actually going to happen. Some of the other changes that will be made are more closely related to things meant for the fan’s enjoyment. Most of these are just matters that should have been addressed a long time ago. I presume Mr. Williams will make these {changes} public at some point before the Spring.
No matter what changes are made, the Wild Things are in a struggle to keep at least a moderate amount
of people coming out to CEP. Right now they don’t much care if these folks are true fans, or not! Why is this issue being given so little attention by the O-R? Before things get any worse we should know just exactly what the situation is before we spend one dime on Wild Things tickets.
As was mentioned Tuesday: "Later this week I'll begin posting my all-decade team, one position at a time."
Hardly changing the subject there Anonymous. Just keeping my word. Big difference.
always an excuse.
Anom is correct. I looked back at the last 3 subjects and they all ended with something about the Wild Things money problems. Do you believe in coincidences? I don’t.
Ima Fraid
As I stated earlier:
"Later this week I'll begin posting my all-decade team, one position at a time."
Hardly changing the subject there Anonymous. Just keeping my word. Big difference.
No excuse.
The Wild Things are playing next year. That's not a story.
I don’t know who the anom is that wrote that first post is but it has to be somebody that has attended the meetings being held by Stu Williams.
Now, the Wild Things are indeed playing next year and, true enough, and that’s NOT a story, at least not now. The fact the Wild Things are taking ridiculous steps to try to stay above water is a story.
We were led to believe that “advisory group” meant that our input was to be put to some good use. However, it now seems that “advisory group” means that we are being advised as to what is going to happen whether we like it, or not. So, take your pick, just what is the definition of “advisory group”?
I’m not real big on smelling elephant dung in the hot summertime but it looks for sure that we all better get ready for it along with a carnival. How thrilling is that?
Mr. Williams should be given credit for at least making a big effort but……… not real sure he should do this at all. Oh well, it’s not my money.
Speaking of money, what a horrible presentation that the TSE offered at the last meeting – talk about a snake oil salesman, wow! I wouldn’t have paid that man a nickel for that.
One more thing. Now the Wild Things want US, their season ticket holders, to tell our neighbors and friends about this new plan for making CEP “the” entertainment complex for all of Washington County.
They have ignored us and our concerns for several years but now WE are supposed to carry the ball for them? Excuse me? Why should we do that? I think that’s a little presumptuous on their part. Especially when I don’t think it’s a good idea in the first place. They should be telling us to assure every one that they will rid themselves of their rude employees.
Ima Fraid
This blog is line a car wreck, I can't look away because of all the idiots that accumulate. Although most of them are probably just Ronald Q. Wilson spouting his B.S.
Your sure right about Ronald Q. Wilson’s BS. That old guy is sure going to look like a fool when the Wild Things don’t have a circus and carnival next season. He has no idea at all what he is saying. He is also totally wrong about all the other really good changes that he says will also take place. He is wrong that we will see even more fireworks next season, too. The Wild Things do not have any money problems at all either. In fact, they are rolling in money despite the low attendance figures. How does this guy ever dream all this stuff up? I’ve heard that the Wild Things have never even contacted TSE about how to put on a better show by computer aided programs and some other changes.
If it weren’t against the rules for posting on this blog I’d call him a couple of names that would make his ears burn. I’m going to call him and tell him to stop posting here. You will probably never have to read what he has posted again – not that you have to read it now mind you!
BTW: I know which Wild Things employee you are.
Ima Fraid
Think there are only 3 or 4 people who comment on this blog, most by RW or his pen names.
Chris I heard a rumor that Chris Bando was signed to a 5 year contact, is that true?
Ask Ronald Q - I know that has that answer.
YUP, 5 years. Why do you think they would do that until he has proven what he can do
Totally agree with your choice of Bill Greenwell! I couldn't believe he didn't made the all-decade team! Of course there were a lot of deserving players left off that team!
John
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home